|
|
Post by dalephillips on Mar 9, 2010 13:49:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by joey on Mar 9, 2010 14:47:08 GMT -5
This is so fucking badass.  |
|
|
|
Post by joey on Mar 9, 2010 14:49:22 GMT -5
Ps- why are old skating photos better than new skating photos? Pantz? Skate technology? Spots? Skateboading on rollerblades?
|
|
|
|
Post by dalephillips on Mar 9, 2010 15:15:33 GMT -5
pantz for sure. and yes that and louie's fish three stood out so much haha
|
|
nabe
Full Member
Posts: 226
|
Post by nabe on Mar 9, 2010 19:18:14 GMT -5
Film...?
|
|
brian
Junior Member
Posts: 96
|
Post by brian on Mar 9, 2010 21:58:04 GMT -5
I know... I don't get it. someone needs to decipher the secret. old photos are better. I need to find the pants I was wearing 7 years ago stat.
|
|
|
|
Post by randy on Mar 11, 2010 0:27:54 GMT -5
all the old photos were taken on film...there was no digital...HUGE factor! and yes pants and "more gangster grabs"
|
|
miked
Full Member
Posts: 194
|
Post by miked on Mar 12, 2010 8:49:18 GMT -5
when i moved out of our apartment i left like a bazillion daily breads there...maybe he still has them.
|
|
corey
Full Member
Posts: 186
|
Post by corey on Mar 12, 2010 23:33:38 GMT -5
Its gotta be film over digital...but not the actual mediums (because they're just as good now), just that digital is so cheap it isn't JUST the best photographers with the best equipment...its like a million people with varying degrees of cameras/lenses/talent. Remember when DB was out? it was like 3 guys taking all the photos
|
|
